Categorised | Conservatives, General, Labour |

Appalling waste of taxpayers money by the Labour Government

David Cameron has been quoted as saying he would not rule out tax increases because he could not be certain of the public finances in two years time. I accept this in part, but let’s face it; there has been a huge amount of information released in recent years outlining this government’s excesses and waste. Surely, David Cameron is not going to preside over a continued waste of taxpayer’s money.

If Cameron wants to be prime minister, he needs to get a grip, by accepting what any businessman will tell you, there is always money to be saved in terms of fat and excess, without necessarily reducing output, service or standards. This is prime example of what happens when we seek to put inexperienced people into office to run a ‘business’ with revenues in excess of £250bn per year. Cameron is supposed to be the leader of the Conservative party with ambitions to be the leader of this country, isn’t it time we witnessed some of his leadership skills?

Clearly Cameron needs some pointers, so here are a few samples of this government’s waste of taxpayer’s money.

 £20bn on an IT system for the NHS that has had questionable trials, and lacks the support of NHS staff, who have also indicated a limited confidence in the systems capabilities. Another £2bn has been lost in tax credit fraud or errors. Or perhaps Cameron could consider the £2.3bn refurbishing civilian offices of MOD?

£1.7bn of taxpayer’s money is being spent settling Metronet’s debts following the failed privatisation of London Underground and it worth reminding ourselves that it was Gordon Brown, who forced through the controversial Public Private Partnership of the Tube when he was Chancellor. A further £300m will go to Transport for London to cover its cost in taking on Metronet’s contracts.

Let’s take a look at the Department of Work and Pensions which has wasted £300m on two cancelled IT projects In 5 years the DWP managed to spend £2.14bn on IT projects, both ongoing and cancelled, with over £500m going to consultants alone. Will this type of mismanagement continue with a Cameron lead government?

A further £486m has been wasted on the computer project for the Child Support Agency and £140m on a system designed to streamline payment of benefits which was shelved because it never worked. Or perhaps £77m on an IT system meant to clear the backlog of immigration casework which was shelved because it missed deadlines.  Maybe he should consider the waste in respect of a system that was being introduced to manage the applications of adults applying for independent learning grants which was scrapped after millions was lost in fraudulent applications; the cost of this was another £97m of taxpayer’s money.

Maybe David Cameron could take a closer look at the Ministry of Defence (MOD)? Apart from the £2.3bn alluded to earlier, to make the civil servants comfortable, he could consider the following.

After failing to include a clause ensuring that Chinooks purchased from the USA would meet UK airworthy standards (responsibility of the previous Conservative government), the MOD has spent more than £300m, now forecast to be £500m to upgrade them. Ordered in 1995, after 20 years, the upgrade on these 8 Chinooks has still not been completed. Likely waste is in the region of £500m plus the cost of the Chinooks! The MOD also scrapped a computer inventory scheme before it was introduced at a cost of £118m and a further £77m on a radar system for the Harrier before it was decided to withdraw it from service.

Once again the MOD judgment must be called into question over a similar situation with the Nimrod AEW aircraft that was supposed to replace the RAF Shackletons. Despite the fact that a well proven replacement, The Boeing E3 was available, the Government decided it was better to spend £1.5billion on a radar system that didn’t work. Having wasted this £1.5bn, they went on to spend another £750 million buying the 7 aircraft that the RAF had wanted to begin with!

The MOD also wrote off £118m on a failed inventory IT project (DSMS). In fact, the MOD may end up writing of over £3bn for a programme to upgrade RAF Nimrods, a plane that is built on the 1950’s Comet airframe and almost certainly with a very limited lifespan. David Cameron does not have to look very far to find government departments where good judgment has been demonstrated to be highly questionable.

Maybe Cameron could review The Pathway project, which promised to introduce a benefits payment card in 2000 and was scrapped after four years of expensive development was scrapped at a cost of £1bn Another £400m was spent on a project aimed at ‘cost control’ for the 2012 Olympics. Something else that should be taken into account when considering the use of taxpayers money is the plan to share services for human resources, payroll and finance using a computer system which was originally forecast to cost £55m with savings of £112m. It is now forecasted that costs will reach £120m with savings of just £40m.

This government has presided over a situation where in spite of the fact that nearly £3bn per annum is spent on ‘consultants’, the decisions that have been reached, remain highly questionable. Has anyone taken any responsibility for this complete waste of public money, the expensive consultants, the lofty, highly rewarded civil servants or the inexperienced ministers? I don’t think so! In spite of proving that they are incapable of making the right decisions in respect of Information Technology projects, this government is forecasted to spend another £14bn of taxpayer’s money this year, this is roughly equivalent to a reduction in personal taxation of 7p in the pound, or if you prefer, a reduction in the top rate of tax from 40% to 33%. Has David Cameron provided any indication that this wanton waste of taxpayer’s money will be a priority of his government if he got into power, I don’t think so!

Now this government wants to spend another £5bn on a computer system to manage a new ID card system. Granted, David Cameron has indicated, in one the few policy decisions he has announced, that the Conservative party, in government will scrap the ID card system. If however, no matter how unlikely, the Conservative government do not get into power, how certain can we be that the Labour government have learnt the lessons of the past and that this, highly questionable project, would be brought in on budget. A recent report indicated that 82% of IT projects have either come in over budget or are expected to. That is an appalling record and for Gordon Brown, someone who is often held up as one of the best (and toughest) chancellors of all time, a very poor legacy indeed. In fact, in my personal opinion, I believe in years to come, this government and specifically this chancellor will be seen to have done more long term damage to this country than any previous government or chancellor in history and we shall be paying the price for decades to come.


This government consistently wastes taxpayers money?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

This government consistently wastes taxpayers money?

  • I strongly agree (94%, 197 Votes)
  • I agree (3%, 7 Votes)
  • I stongly disagree (1%, 3 Votes)
  • I disagree (1%, 2 Votes)
  • I am neutral (0%, 0 Votes)

Total Voters: 209


Loading ... Loading ...

Warning: file_get_contents( failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 404 Not Found in /home/hughes/49MHP6KJ/htdocs/power/wp-content/plugins/wikiovote.php on line 40

5 Comments For This Post

  1. Shrewdy Says:

    When you look at the £Billions that flow into these and many other shameful and downright arrogantly wasteful projects instigated by departments that seem to have no inkling of the fact that they are spending OUR money, you cannot help but feel extreme anger, slight depression, a darkening sense of foreboding and an altogether overwhelming desire to extract personal and painful revenge.

    To look at the total spent and WASTED and try to balance it with our disgusting treatment of the old, the abhorrent abrogation of social responsibility towards those in need I cannot help but conclude that those in positions of unelected power in government departments should be lined up against a wall and shot, or more practically made to be accountable for the shambles over which they preside.

    I find it amazing and frankly absurd that the Civil “Servants” in charge of some of these failures that occur are simply bustled into another department where they can wreak more havoc on the public purse. They should be sacked, no they should be sacked then taken to court for mis-use of public property.

    Or shot of course.(Hang on, now I will be arrested under the Prevention of Terrorism Act won’t I?)

    Anyway, it makes me so angry to see how this (and to be fair any) government have such a mis-aligned sense of both reality and purpose, no clear indication of a connection with the real world and a near calamitous desire to steer our public purse to the edge of a precipice, all the while collecting fat salaries, fat pensions and fat perks.

    If you work for the people, you are accountable to them.

    We are frankly treated with contempt by those in positions of unelected power.


    Depressed of Hull.

  2. Frustrated Voter Says:

    Yes, I agree, civil servants and their masters should be held to account. We are constantly witnessing further rules and regulations which apply to us and our employers, but civil servants and their masters seem to be exempt. It also makes me angry, particularly when they simply shrug their shoulders and move on as if it didn’t matter. It demonstrates complete and utter contempt. Ministers and civil servants rely on the complacency on the part of the electorate and in a way, given for the most part this is reality, who can blame them.

    As I have said before, there need to be groundswell of public opinion against waste, against the failure of our ministers to deliver and for political parties to discard their manifesto commitments as soon as they are elected. There must also be a removal of this idea that the state will pay, when this really means that those in work and paying taxes will pick up the bill.

  3. Shrewdy Says:

    I think perhaps the internet provides for us the mechanism or retaining knowledge in a central place of all the promises made, and statements published by governments, departments and prospective governments.

    We would need around 300 dedicated people to document and refer back to these statements and policies on an ongoing basis (assuming around 4 people per section/department). Only by undertaking this level of analysis can we hope to make it know than aside from the agenda setting liberal media of the UK there is another body doing this work on behalf of the millions without a voice.

    I’d be happy to buy a domain, set up the software and pay for the hosting for this project – now if I could find 299 other dedicated people to help out.

    It would be a mammoth undertaking but one well worth while if managed properly and worked in conjunction with other well know websites….

    Hmmmm – contact me via my blog (Page: UKTPA) if you have any views/ideas/opinions.

  4. Mr Angry Says:

    There is so little oversight on government spending. Yes, the ONS and the odd committee will issue a slapped wrist for the governments errors, but the only people that end up paying the price for this governments mistakes is the tax payers. It is as if they thing there is a never ending supply of money, which I guess is true, because they will just raise taxes.

  5. humane Says:

    It’s just so sad that there is such a thing as inequality in our country. It sickens and saddens me immeasurably

7 Trackbacks For This Post

  1. Review of UK political commentary website | Professional Website Reviews | Professional Website Reviews Says:

    […] matter and include commentaries on subjects such as political parties, government policies and government waste. One particularly useful page to UK residents will be the list of websites or blogs for members of […]

  2. New UK planning laws attempt to prevent noise and light polution complaints | Power to the People! UK Politics, Comments and Opinions Says:

    […] that many people in other first world countries actually take for granted. Little by little, this Labour government is taking away our rights to complain, to raise our legitimate concerns and our entitlement to a […]

  3. Power to the People - A lone political voice :: No more noise, pollution or light compaints in the UK :: August :: 2008 Says:

    […] many people in other first world countries actually take for granted. Little by little, this Labour government is taking away our rights to complain, to raise our legitimate concerns and our entitlement to a […]

  4. Just a rant about public spending… « Shrewd Mammal Says:

    […] public spending… 07Sep08 I posted this as a comment on the excellent site “Power to the people” and well, I just wanted to post it here to… When you look at the £Billions that flow […]

  5. Are UK members of parliament (MP's) fit for purpose? | Power to the People! UK Politic's Blog, Commentary and Opinions Says:

    […] if our members of parliament had not screwed us for more and more tax, then squandered so much of this income, or they had not attempted to turn this country into a police state by eroding our civil liberties, […]

  6. David Cameron is a man with a plan that includes tax increases | Power to the People! UK Politic's Blog, Commentary and Opinions Says:

    […] massive government waste on projects and initiatives that have gone nowhere, or are going nowhere, there is plenty of ‘fat’ that be cut before dipping into our pockets. Much as many of us want to get rid of New Labour, I would urge […]

  7. More Hideous Government Spending on Furniture | Global Changes Says:

    […] party (and politics in general) is gross wasteful spending of tax payers money. Whether it’s half a billion on Helicopters that are desperately needed by our armed forces, but that are still incomplete and stuck in a […]

Leave a Reply

Advertise Here